![]() Could it be that the owner of sent a DMCA complaint to Google simply because another site was getting higher rankings for the phrase “perfect pitch”? If so, then that’s a whole new level of SEO snake-oilery. The markup is pretty lean, the content is semantically structured and there’s plenty of inbound links. The Session has pretty good Google juice. There is another possible explanation for this insane over-reaction one that would explain why the offended party sent the complaint to Google rather than going down the more traditional route of threatening the ISP… However, the part about agreeing to potentially show up in a court in California is somewhat off-putting for those of us, like me, who live outside the United States of America. To be fair, Google also explain how to file a counter-complaint. But it all takes is for the owner of to abuse the Digitial Millenium Copyright Act with a spurious complaint and just like that, Google removes the discussion from its search index. They don’t really say anything particularly disparaging. They don’t repost any materials from the site. In a discussion about perfect pitch, someone mentions the website. It does, however, list the party who sent the complaint: Boucherle.īy a staggering coincidence, Gary Boucherle of American Educational Music, Inc. Google link to the complaint on Chilling Effects but that just says The cease-and-desist or legal threat you requested is not yet available. ![]() That single reference to a third-party site is, apparently, enough to trigger a DMCA complaint. I think that is referring to I’m not saying anything about such commercially-oriented courses because I don’t know them, but I think we’d all be wise to bear in mind the general comments voiced in the first two posts on this thread. ![]() Here’s the only part of the discussion that references an external resource in a non-flattering light: I visited the URL and found a fairly tame discussion about Perfect Pitch. This content has been removed from all Google search results.Ĭause: Somone has filed a DMCA complaint against your site. One of the messages had the subject line Blocked URLs:įor legal reasons, we’ve excluded from our search results content located at or under the following URL/directory: Who knew that Google Webmaster Tools has a messaging system? I guess all software really does evolve until it can send email. I noticed that I had some unread messages. I logged in today for the first time in ages and started poking around. I am sorry to say that Pitch Perfect only gets a 4.We were having a chat in the Clearleft office today about site stats and their relative uselessness numbers about bounce rates are like eyetracking data-without knowing the context, they’re not going to tell you anything.Īnyway, I was reminded that I have an account over at Google Webmaster Tools set up for three of my sites:, and. The characters are the same, but they've just been placed in a bad film, and that's sad because you want the final film in a series to be good. If they could do this well, then I say sure go for it, but they just didn't. Like it goes from regular Pitch Perfect stuff to an action/spy movie and I don't feel like it worked. Also, the plot isn't that interesting and the plot delves into absolute insanity. The comedy has stopped working for the most part, yes there are a few laughs, but not a lot. This film gave me a very hollow, empty feeling from start to finish. I am a fan of the first Pitch Perfect, I gave that film an 8, admittedly I have not seen the second installment, but I don't feel like I needed to to get this one. Only reason that I say I hope it's the last is because once you go as low in quality as this film, it is time to stop. Pitch Perfect 3 (2017) is the third installment, hopefully the last of the Pitch Perfect series. Reviewed by davispittman 4 / 10 Gave me an empty feeling
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |